Love Island USA, season 4, 38 episodes
I scraped the subtitle transcripts for all 38 episodes, 224,815 words, and measured how much English a viewer needs to follow them. Published estimates put 95% coverage of everyday spoken English at about 3,000 word families. This show needs well under half that.
| Question | How many English word families does a viewer need to follow Love Island USA? |
|---|---|
| Data | Subtitle transcripts of all 38 episodes of season 4 (2022): 224,815 tokens, 7,856 word types |
| Method | Tokens lemmatized with WordNet as a stand-in for word families, ranked by frequency, coverage read off the cumulative share; textstat readability, a Zipf fit and MTLD per episode |
| Benchmark | About 3,000 word families for 95% of everyday spoken English (Adolphs and Schmitt 2003; Nation 2006), and about the same for TV dialogue (Webb and Rodgers 2009) |
| Result | 1,249 families reach 95% coverage and 2,554 reach 98%. Flesch-Kincaid grade 2.81. |
| Main limit | One season of one show. Subtitles drop overlapping talk, accents and speed, so coverage understates how hard the show is to follow. |
A line from episode 1. Under each word is its word-family rank in the
season's corpus ("is" counts as "be"). A viewer who knows the top 1,250 families
understands the first five words; the two in italics fall outside. Ranks computed
with the lemmatizer from scripts/analyze_vocab_level.py.
Know the 1,249 most common word families and you follow 95.0% of the speech. About one word in 20 would be new to you.
Every point is the season's own coverage curve: the 224,815 tokens lemmatized and ranked
with the method in scripts/analyze_vocab_level.py, which reproduces the
250, 592, 1,249 and 2,554 in V4/tables/vocabulary_coverage.csv exactly.
Word families are approximated by WordNet lemmas.
of all speech is the 100 most common words. The top 10 alone are 22.7%.
word families reach 98% coverage, still below the 3,000 that everyday English needs for 95%.
Flesch-Kincaid grade, with a Flesch Reading Ease of 90.2. 97.9% of words are on the Dale-Chall list of 3,000 familiar words.
for the Zipf fit of log frequency on log rank, slope −1.45.
The question
Intermediate learners are routinely told to watch native-speaker television, and most of it is too hard for them. A corpus turns "is this show hard?" into a number: rank every word family by frequency, add up their share of the speech, and read off how many families it takes to reach 95% coverage.
The comparison figures come from the published literature: about 3,000 word families for 95% of everyday spoken English (Adolphs and Schmitt 2003; Nation 2006), and about the same for TV dialogue in general (Webb and Rodgers 2009). This show reaches 95% at 1,249 families, 90% at 592 and 98% at 2,554.
Reading level
The formulas disagree by four grades. Flesch-Kincaid, which leans on sentence length, scores the short spoken sentences as very easy, and every episode falls between 2.3 and 3.7. SMOG and Dale-Chall weight long and unfamiliar words more, and read higher. Only 2.1% of the words spoken fall outside the Dale-Chall list of 3,000 familiar words.
US school grade by formula, bars on a 0 to 8 scale. From V4/tables/reading_level.csv (textstat).
The distribution
Word frequency follows Zipf's law closely: regressing log frequency on log rank gives R² = 0.981 and a slope of −1.45, as in most natural language. What stands out is how much the head carries. The top 10 words are 22.7% of all speech, the top 30 are 39.8%, the top 100 are 61.0% and the top 1,000 are 91.1%. "Like" alone is 2.8%.
Rank, word and share of all 224,815 tokens, from V4/tables/top100_words.csv. Raw word forms, not families.
V4/tables/statistical_tests.csv). Counts recomputed from the corpus with the tokenizer in scripts/; the top 100 match top100_words.csv exactly.Across the season
Lexical diversity averages an MTLD of 59.96 per episode with no trend across the season (Spearman ρ = −0.03, p = 0.87). Sentiment polarity from TextBlob is positive in every episode, also with no trend (ρ = −0.15, p = 0.37). Episode 38, the last, is the longest at 11,366 words.
Per-episode values from V4/tables/lexical_diversity.csv and sentiment_scores.csv; the dashed line is the season mean. Hover or use the arrow keys for a single episode.
Texture
Adjectives are only 8.4% of words, against 24.5% verbs and 13.6% pronouns. The filler words are frequent enough to chart on their own: "like" appears 28 times per 1,000 words, "know" 13, "yeah" 12 and "just" 12. This is unscripted speech, and unscripted speakers lean on a small stock of words.
Uses per 1,000 words, the top 8 of 24 tracked fillers, from V4/tables/filler_word_counts.csv. Every use is counted, including "like" as a verb, so these overstate filler use.
Limitations
This is one season of one show, and generalizing to reality TV as a genre would take more seasons to compare against.
Subtitles drop what makes speech hard to follow: overlapping talk, accents and speed of delivery. A show can be lexically easy and still hard to parse at full speed, so the coverage number is a lower bound on difficulty.
Word families are approximated by WordNet lemmatization, which merges inflections ("making" to "make") but not derived forms. Readability formulas were built for written prose and disagree on this dialogue, from grade 3 to about 7.
Method
The repository ships the cleaned corpus, one .txt per episode plus a
combined CSV, so every number can be checked. The paper is written in Markdown,
converted to LaTeX by a script in the repo, and compiled to PDF.
V4/tables/